Data collected for this survey was for the period ending June 30, 2011 and took in the results of 25 of Australia’s most prominent retailers who collectively have over 1700 stores across Australia (including Department stores, Discount Department stores, and fashion, hardgoods & specialty stores).
The main motivation for employees to leave was “lack of individual recognition by the organisation” which particularly at store level, was a result of poor leadership and communication by the person they directly report to. With the tough times we’ve experienced in retail for some time now, employee numbers and rosters have been drastically reduced, creating an increased workload and pressure on those that remain. Those companies that are demanding longer shifts and chasing the sales figures too hard who don’t have a culture of appreciation, communication and belonging, are seeing employees pulling the pin to go elsewhere. This has led to us seeing it again becoming a candidate short market so the war for good talent is hotting right up, as organisations recognise the contribution that high performing employees contribute to the bottom line.
Whilst the average store employee turnover is 50.1%, the survey shows the spread of results is huge. At the bottom end, one specialty chain with approximately 40 stores came in at a respectable 13%, whilst a 100 plus store fashion retailer was at the other end of the scale at 95%. Because the cost to a company is rarely calculated out in real dollar terms, most organisations underestimate the significant cost. Instead the costs are hidden among a number of areas including lost sales, damage to morale, as well as the costs associated with recruitment including time to interview & shortlist, advertising & agency fees and further management time on induction & basic training.
One prominent ladies fashion chain reported that they were without a Store Manager at their Chatswood location for 4 months. If for example the store was a $2million a year store, and the result of not having a Manager to motivate and drive the team creates a dip in sales of just 13%, that equates to a shortfall in sales of over $20,000 per month. Whilst 4 months would seem extreme, difficult locations such as Sydney’s northern beaches, Canberra, and W.A. can see a store without key employees for longer periods. Added to this are the actual recruitment costs including management time to interview & shortlist, other expenses such as advertising & agency fees, costs of induction and also basic training which can add up to another $2000 - $5000 per resignation.
The costs to the business of head office positions are more difficult to measure. The amount of time needed to recruit, induct and get an employee up to maximum efficiency & productivity run into many months. In fact the survey reported an average 8.1 weeks needed just to replace, let alone the time needed for the employee to get up to speed. In terms of difficulty to replace employees, 56% of respondents believe it is more difficult than it was for the same time last year. Not surprisingly, good Merchandise Planners came in as the hardest to find, whilst Buyers, Area & Regional Managers, E-Commerce and Supply Chain executives were also mentioned. Those organisations that have a strong “people culture” and develop their management teams to practise the fundamentals such as providing leadership, direction, measurement, feedback, recognition, and fair reward, have a far lower employee turnover, than those that just giving it lip service.
Finally, according to a recent paper by the Australian Centre for Retail Studies (ACRS), building a sense of community is critical to developing a workplace environment in which employees engage. “Today’s ideal Manager is one who values communication and creates an environment of transparency and respect for staff” they reported. In terms of shop floor staff, the ACRS adds that regular training and development, the opportunity to network or communicate with head office, clear career prospects and promotional opportunities along with some added flexibility in work hours were all seen as more important factors than salary level when employees decide to leave.